Skip to content
Lump sum or staggered?

All at once — or spread out?

Inheritance, severance, bonus: this compares both paths and gives you the number that actually matters — how weak the market may be at most during the entry phase for waiting to pay off.

€
months
%
%
%
years

A deterministic comparison of your assumptions — no probability statement and no market forecast.

Lump sum ends up ahead by €2,116.86.

The staggered entry only wins if prices move by less than 2% per year during those 12 months.

Lump sum

€135,373.04

Staggered

€133,256.18

Break-even price move

2%

Comparison of both entry paths
After the entry phase: lump sum€52,500.00
After the entry phase: staggered€51,679.05
Interest on waiting cash€543.31
Difference at the end€2,116.86

No randomness involved: the price move during the entry phase is your input, everything else follows from it.

What does this mean for your real wealth?

The calculation above compares both routes with a fixed return. How your real contributions have developed, Planafolio shows from your imported portfolio – as a return per year (XIRR) across all buys, for free.

Check lump sum vs savings plan in a financial plan
Share this calculation:

What does the result mean?

The result shows whether investing at once or entering step by step leads to more final wealth in the model – and at what market development this reverses.

Model assumptions

  • During the entry phase your assumed market development applies, and cash not yet invested earns the savings-account rate (untaxed). After that, both paths earn the same return.
  • The return stays constant for the whole period. Real markets fluctuate; losing years are not part of the model.
  • Taxes on returns (German flat tax, advance lump sum) are not deducted.
  • Fund costs, order fees and spreads are not deducted.
  • All amounts are nominal. Purchasing power falls with inflation, which the result does not reflect.

How the calculator works

With a staggered entry, an equal part is invested each month while the rest earns interest in a savings account. After the entry phase, both paths earn the same long-term return.

More on the methodology

Worked example

Example: invest now or phase in gradually?

The calculator's default values above: a larger amount is either invested at once or in equal monthly instalments; the waiting money sits in a savings account in the meantime.

Inputs

  • Available amount€50,000
  • Phase-in period12 months
  • Annual price change during the phase-in (assumption)5%
  • Annual return afterwards (assumption)7%
  • Annual savings account rate2%
  • Investment horizon15 years

Calculation

Calculation
Lump sum after the phase-in period€52,500
Phased in, after the phase-in period (with savings interest)€51,679
Of which savings account interest€543

Result

Result
Final value, lump sum€135,373
Final value, phased in€133,256
Difference at the end€2,117

The lump sum is ahead because the waiting money misses the price rise. Phasing in would only have paid off if prices had moved less than 2% per year during the phase-in.

Price change (5%) and return (7%) are assumptions, the same defaults as in the calculator above. Nobody knows in advance how prices will move during the phase-in.

Common mistakes

  • Treating market moves during entry as known

    Nobody knows them in advance. The calculator shows what your assumption produces and the break-even move at which waiting pays off. The decision remains a bet on the market.

  • Treating the cash account as tax-free

    Money not yet invested earns interest without tax in the model. In reality interest is subject to flat-rate tax (26.375% including solidarity surcharge) unless the saver's allowance covers it.

  • Not considering fees per purchase

    Costs are not deducted. With many small purchases, per-order fees can matter; with a single order they do not.

Sources and status

Content reviewed on September 29, 2026. The sources are official German legal texts and data and are therefore in German.

The calculation is a simplified model under the stated assumptions and is not investment or tax advice.

What can I do?

Nobody knows the market development during the entry phase in advance. The break-even development shows how weak the market would have to be for waiting to pay off in the model.

What this is really about

The question is not return, it is regret

Both paths have a clear profile — and a clear price.

Historically the lump sum usually came out ahead

A Vanguard study (2012; US, UK, Australia) found that investing a lump sum immediately beat spreading it over 12 months in about two thirds of the periods examined. The reason: money that waits is not invested while markets rise. The calculator shows this effect as soon as you assume rising prices — if prices fall, phasing in can do better.

Staggering buys calm

Seeing a 20% drop right after investing everything can make people sell at the worst moment. A staggered entry gives up some expected return and lowers precisely that risk.

The break-even makes it testable

Instead of arguing about forecasts, the calculator states the price move below which waiting would have paid off. Because of the interest on waiting cash, that threshold is usually above zero. You can hold that number against your own view.

Frequently asked

Planning your entry

Embed this calculator on your own site

Free, no sign-up, no tracking. A one-line snippet that resizes itself — for blogs, guides and comparison sites.

Get the embed code →

More calculators

You might also like

Don't just calculate — keep track

Planafolio follows your portfolio, taxes and retirement plan automatically. Start free, no credit card.

Check lump sum vs savings plan in a financial plan